habi.gna.ch

Jump to content

Additional information

Categories

Recent Comments

Meta


Baldachin by Night II

Jun 2009
01

dur­ing the past few weeks i’ve been think­ing about the panorama i’ve shot of the bal­dachin near the railway-station here in bern. i’ve thought it would be very nice to have a nightly ver­sion of the same panorama. so, yes­ter­day evening i again spent some time on the buben­berg­platz and shot quite a bunch of images. i’ve had two lenses with me, the newly aquired 16mm zen­i­tar fish­eye which makes shoot­ing panora­mas a breeze, since the FOV is so big, but is actu­ally quite a has­sle to setup, since it’s a fully man­ual lens, so more suited for this task than for snap­shots. in addi­tion to the zen­i­tar i’ve had my trusty 38-80mm zoom lens

the first results from my mini-photo-safari can be seen in this set here on flickr. most of the images are shot with the zen­i­tar, but the impor­tant one is shown here below:

small-DSC_2284-DSC_2416_fused.jpg

the image is humon­gous (600 kB), so you need to wait a lit­tle bit until it loads. to close the pop-up, scroll toward the far right!

again, it’s a panorama, this time shot and com­posed from 123 images in total (really!). all the images have been taken yes­ter­day evening from 21:35 until 21:45, so if the setup is good, you can shoot a panorama like that in 10 min­utes, includ­ing wait­ing time until all the cars, busses and trams are where you want them…

the panorama is — again, as the one shot about three months ago in the after­noon — com­posed from three expo­sures for each posi­tion, hence i’ve cov­ered the field of view with 41 images and fused the images down to one enhanced expo­sure with enfuse built into hugin.

i really need to get a nice very wide angle lens, since shoot­ing panora­mas with the zen­i­tar is really a breeze, apart from the man­ual setup. this panorama has been com­posed from only three images and looks already quite impres­sive. really impres­sive — in my opin­ion any­ways — is that shoot­ing a full 360° panorama of the buben­berg­platz only requires 10 images and about one and a half minute and can be seen below (444 kB):

DSC_2432-DSC_2441.jpg

the full 360°-panorama is of course much nicer in the fully inter­ac­tive view, pro­vided here.


10 Comments

  1. # Bastian on June 1st, 2009

    your panos are stun­ning! wait a sec­ond that i can close my mouth ;)

    i like the sec­ond (darker) pano but it’s a bit grainy espe­cially when you keep your eye at the dark ground. did you use a higher ISO in the sec­ond pano?

  2. # Peter on June 1st, 2009

    Great shots! Thanks for point­ing me to this enblend enfuse stuff. I was hugin using before but most of my panos are made with autos­titch. See some of the on my flickr account.

  3. # habi on June 1st, 2009

    @bastian: thanks for the com­pli­ments. espe­cially from you, from some­one who shoots extremely good pic­tures, this is appre­ci­ated. i’m still strug­gling a bit with the fully man­ual mode of the zenitar-lens, so the sec­ond panorama might not be ide­ally exposed that’s why it’s grainy. and addi­tion­ally, my cam­era is sat to auto-ISO at the moment… the first one is fused so you get the ideal pix­els from each expo­sure, thus less grainy.
    @peter: thank you also! autos­titch is not avail­able for os x, and hugin is much more pow­er­ful for what i use it. if you’ve not used hugin for a long time you should give the beta-version a try, it has come a long way. and if you’re inter­ested in the insides of enblend/enfuse, you should watch the tech­nol­ogy talk about enblend/enfuse by its main pro­gram­mer, andrew mihal.

  4. # Peter on June 1st, 2009

    Well the tech­nol­ogy of hugin is per­fect, but the han­dling ist much more dif­fi­cult then autos­titch and it is slower. An advan­tage is, that you get the sin­gle picks and can select the masks your­self with pho­to­shop. Autos­titch seems to me hav­ing per­for­mance if you are stitcht­ing in two dimen­sions as in this exam­ple.

  5. # rouge on June 1st, 2009

    Great Pic­tures!

  6. # habi on June 1st, 2009

    @peter: as i’ve said, hugin has devel­oped quite a bit, the image shown above is actu­ally com­posed from 123 images, 41 for each expo­sure. the images are aligned in a 4 * 11 grid ( * 3 for each expo­sure…). oh, and autos­titch is not avail­able on the mac (at least not for free, it’s built in into cal­ico, which costs 40 $).
    @rouge: thanks! now you’ve got a new image you can use as a back­ground for your blog :)

  7. # rouge on June 5th, 2009

    @habi: I would absolutely like to but unfor­tu­nately I changed my design yesterday :-(

  8. # habi on June 5th, 2009

    i’ve seen it, it looks really nice!

  9. # Harry on June 7th, 2009

    Hi Habi,

    great panos, espe­cially the 21:35–21:45. Apart from the immac­u­late tech­ni­cal imple­men­ta­tion, the atmosh­phere of the pano is fantastic.

    Harry

  10. # habi on June 8th, 2009

    hi harry,
    sorry, your com­ment got caught into the moderation-queue. thanks for the kind com­ment! i hope i’ll soon be able to stitch it really big :)


Your Comment

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>




Tags

Archives

Credits

Template designed by praegnanz.de.